Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (1) TMI 269

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....yan: Heard both sides extensively on the stay petition. 2. The relevant facts, in brief, are that estate owned by M/s. Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. sold to M/s. Gospel For Asia. In connection with the sale and transfer of the said estate, one Shri Varkey George and Shri M.M. Sulaiman (the present appellant) have rendered certain services. A amount of Rs.20 crores stands paid to Shri Varkey Georg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....crores was given to Shri Benny Joseph and the said amount was meant to meet the expenses for settlement of labour. The appellant has received only a sum of Rs.4.88 crores and the said amount can at the most be described as towards services rendered under the category of "Business Support Services", the main service being 'Real Estate Service' rendered by Shri Varkey George. Further, he submits tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the appellant in pursuance of the impugned order. 4. The learned Additional Commissioner (AR), referring to the same agreement dt. 12/08/2005, submits that the amount of Rs.8 crores was paid on instructions and on account of the present appellant and no evidence has been produced by the appellant that the said amount was utilized for settlement of labour dues. On the other hand, the evidence ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egards the claim of the learned advocate that the demand is hit by time bar inasmuch as the show-cause notice has been issued even beyond 5 years, we notice that the appellant has not taken up registration during the relevant period. They ought to have taken registration and filed half yearly returns for the period April to September by 25th of October, 2005 and the notice has been issued on 06/10....