2012 (12) TMI 873
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pellant Rep. by : Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Adv JUDGEMENT We are satisfied that the order under challenge is a just order. The reasoning appearing at paragraph 6 of the judgment and/or order under challenge reads as follows : " In the present case before us the assessee has deducted tax u/s. 194C(2) of the Act being payments made to sub-contractors and it is not a case of non-....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ly non-deduction of tax and disallowance of such payments. According to him, it does not refer to genuineness of the payment or otherwise but addition u/s. 40(a)(ia) can be made even though payments are genuine but tax is not deducted as required u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act. We are of the view that the conditions laid down u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act for making addition is that tax is deductible at sour....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to treat, inter alia, the assessee as defaulter where there is a shortfall in deduction. With regard to the shortfall, it cannot be assumed that there is a default as the deduction is not as required by or under the Act, but the facts is that this expression, 'on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction has not been paid on or be....
TaxTMI