TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2012 (12) TMI 425
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he necessary permits/authorizations required for the operation of the equipments and for the performance of the job specified. GSPC has to give concurrence to the equipments and personnel. M/s Atwood shall also be responsible for the safety of the personnel and equipments. (iii) M/s Atwood shall prepare a 'Daily drilling report' for all the work in the well and shall furnish a copy of the report to GSPC. (iv) At GSPC's request M/s Atwood shall (a) complete the well as producer in the manner and by methods specified by GSPC, or (b) cease operations and plug or abandon the well, at any depth, in the manner GSPC directs. (v) All survey notes, drawings, invoices for materials, permits, permit applications, specifications, blueprints, reports, calculations and all other material prepared by M/s Atwood in connection with the work shall be transferred to GSPC upon completion of each well and/or upon completion of work/termination of the contract. (vi) GSPC shall pay M/s Atwood as per agreed rates. The invoicing shall be at the end of each month accompanied by the drilling reports. (vii) M/s Atwood has indemnified GSPC from all damages pertainin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rvey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas service'. (ii) services such as site formation and clearance and excavation and earth moving, drilling wells for production/exploitation of hydrocarbons (developmental drilling); well testing and analysis service; sub-contracted service such as deploying workers and machinery for extraction/breaking of rocks into stones, sieving, grading etc. ; outsourced services provided for mining which were individually classified under the appropriate taxable service were comprehensively brought under 'services provided in relation to Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas'. Thus, exploration and exploitation of mineral, oil or gases were brought under service tax from 01.06.2007, which was the legislative intent. (iii) Activity carried out by M/s Atwood is for exploration, site preparation and not for exploitation. As the contract is basically about exploratory drilling and not actual exploitation the activity would be covered under the services in relation to survey and exploration of minerals. (iv) the adjudicating authority is thus not justified in not considering the classification of service rendered by M/s Atwood in the cate....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the petitioner i.e. providing vessels on time charter basis to various oil and gas producers was held to be falling under section 65(105) (zzzzj) i.e. 'supply of tangible goods for use' and not under section 65(105)(zzzy) which pertains to 'mining of mineral, oil and gas'. (vi) Reliance is also placed on various other decisions viz. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. State of AP [1990] 77 STC 182 (AP) affirmed by the Hon'ble SC as well as Commissioner, Trade Tax v. Chabra Tourist Bus Service [MANU/UP/1355/2006] to contend that there is no transfer of possession and effective control where the supplier's employees are operating the equipment. 7. Both sides made very extensive oral Submissions and also submitted written submissions. We reproduce the written submissions. 8. Submissions by Revenue are as under. 8.1 The whole issue revolves around three contending entries, namely (i) Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas service' (ii) Mining of mineral, oil and gas (iii) Supply of tangible goods for use The definitions of these three entries are as under: 'Survey and exploration of mineral' means geological, geophysical or ot....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....auxiliary operations and services necessary to carry out the work for company'.' A perusal of the above part of the contract makes it clear that the contract entered into between M/s Atwood, the contractor, and GSPC, the company is to drill, test and complete the exploratory wells. The activity which is to be done by the contractor is to drill the exploratory wells for exploration of oil. The definition of 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas service' also makes it clear that activities involved in the exploration of minerals, oil and gases fall under this service. The adjudicating authority has also contended that the SCN proceeds on the basis of legislative intent. However, Ministry's letter F.No. B2/8/2004-TRU dated 10.09.2004 issued at the time of introduction of the service and which, as contemporanea exposito, explains that the service tax under this service would be limited to the services rendered in relation to survey and exploration only and not on the activity of actual extraction after the survey and exploration is complete. Activities such as seismic survey, collection/processing/interpretation of data and drilling and testing in relation to survey and ex....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rocarbon from the aforementioned block. 8.4 M/s Atwood has contended that from 01.06.2007 the Department has sought to classify the activities undertaken by them under 'Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas service'. However, there has been no change in the definition of the service 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas service' after 01.06.2007. There are a catena of case laws wherein it has been held that when an activity comes under the service tax net with effect from a certain date the same activity cannot be subjected to tax under a pre-existing category unless the scope of the pre-existing categories of service is simultaneously modified. Thus, in view of the above, the activities would not fall under 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas service'. However, in this regard it may be mentioned that Finance Ministry in Para 3.4 of its letter DO F. No. 334/1/2008-TRU, dated 29-2-2008 has categorically stated that 'Specifying a service separately as a taxable service does not necessarily mean or suggest that services falling within the scope of newly specified service were not earlier classifiable under any one of the existing taxable services. Grouping of services....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....occurs first among the sub-clauses which equally merit consideration.] On plain reading of the above section, it is clear that the legislature recognized and envisaged the possibility of an overlap between two services and thus provided a remedy in the form of Section 65A to resolve such an overlap. This view has also been supported by the Tribunal in the case of Kopran Ltd. v. CCE [2009] 20 STT 414 (Mum. - CESTAT) wherein it was held that - 'As per Rule 65A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, it is possible for a service to be classifiable under two different categories. As per the classification rule, the classification would be done under the head, which is more specific failing which under the category which comes first. Thus, introduction of a new service by carving out from an earlier service will not mean that the new service was not taxable under any other category earlier. Thus, even though the service regarding transfer of intellectual property was introduced with effect from 10-9-2004, it does not mean that the service would not be covered under any other category earlier even if it was covered under the definition of a new service.' 8.6 Further, while clarifying th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f Mineral, Oil or Gas service' could have been earlier covered under 'Survey and exploration of mineral service'. For this proposition, the following case laws are relied upon- (a) Ajay Gandhi v. B. Singh 2004 (167) ELT 257 (SC) - Paras 16 and 17. (b) Commissioner of Trade Tax, UP v. Kajaria Ceramics Ltd. 2005 (191) ELT 20 (SC) - Para 28. Thus, in view of Board's letters cited above it is clear that drilling wells for production/exploitation of hydrocarbons (development drilling) was earlier classifiable under 'Survey and Exploration of mineral service'. 9. Submissions by Atwood are as under. 9.1 Issue: Classification of services provided by Atwood to GSPC in terms of Contract No. GSPC-JEL-GGR/KG-OSN-2001/13 dated September 2005 9.2 Key Dates/Milestones 3rd September 2005 : Signing of Contract December 2006 : Commencement of services in terms of the contract 9th Feb 2009 : Registration obtained & Service Tax paid under Category 'SOTG' from 16.5.2008 till Jan 2009 along with interest. Total amount paid was approximately Rs. 11 Crore 16th February 2009 :Meeting with Commissioner and other Senior Officials of Ahmedabad' III Commissionerate. Le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion or effective control in the equipment that was supplied to GSPC. This is clear from Para 35 of the SCN (page 306 & 312 of paper book) and from order of Commissioner (page 173 of paper book). The use, however, of the tangible goods was transferred to GSPC, who alone could decide how to use the equipment for the duration of the contract. It is abundantly clear that the activity is squarely covered by section 65(105)(zzzzj) as read with the clarification issued by CBEC. * In order to determine the nature of the services it is pertinent to examine the contract in its entirely so as to understand its pith and substance. Examination of the contract establishes that the duties, obligations and rights of the assessee were related to ensuring availability of the Oil rig for use by GSPC. The performance was not measured in terms of drilling activity but by availability of the rig. The remuneration was not related to drilling activity but to the period for which the rig remained in use by GSPC. * The relevant provisions of the contract between Atwood and GSPC in this regard are as follows' * Atwood was engaged to provide an offshore oil rig,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....perated at all time with the department. In such circumstance the extended period of limitation could not have been invoked. 9.5 Penalty * Commissioner held that this was a fit case for invoking the provisions of Section 80. Accordingly, he dropped the proposal for levy of penalty under section 78. However, as Section 80 begins with a non obstante clause that gives Section 80 overriding precedence over section 76, 77 and 78, Commissioner should not have levied penalty under section 76 and 77 also. It is pertinent to mention that the Department, in its appeal, has not challenged the invocation of Section 80 by the Commissioner in his order. 9.6 Cum-Tax * If at all any tax is payable by Atwood then the amount recovered by Atwood from GSPC has to be regarded as cum-tax and the service tax liability ought to be worked out accordingly. This is because till date GSPC has not reimbursed a single rupee towards Service Tax to Atwood. 9.7 Service not within meaning of 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas Services' in terms of the provisions of sub clause (zzv) of section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 * The department has ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ds as under :- 'Section 65 (105)(zzzzj) :- taxable service' means any service provided or to be provided : - to any person, by any other person in relation to supply of tangible goods including machinery, equipment and appliances for use, without transferring right of possession and effective control of such machinery, equipment and appliances; 10.2 The service tax on 'supply of tangible goods service' is leviable if the service provider supplies only Tangible Goods to its client but does not do any activity beyond supply of tangible goods. The appellant did not simply supply the drilling rigs to M/s GSPC but also engaged its own drilling crew to drill and complete the wells. 10.3 As per Clause 1.14 of the contract, 'work' shall mean all drilling operations, services and activities to be performed by contractor. Thus, the said contract is not for supply of Drilling Rigs but for drilling of wells. The object of the contract is given in clause 3 which says that the contractor shall drill, complete or abandon the well(s) and company shall pay for such performance of drilling, completion or abandonment services. Clause 7.4 provides that company is interested only in the res....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e under said service only because appellant did not transfer the possession and control of drilling rigs to M/s GSPC does not appear to be correct. The appellant actually provides service of drilling the wells by their own equipments and personnel and hence the service is classifiable under 'Mining of mineral, oil or gas'. 10.5 It has been contended that they are charging fixed amounts in respect of equipments on per day basis and not based on usage of drills. Schedule F to the contract reveals that there are 6 different rates viz. operating rate, standby with crew rate, standby without crew rate, equipment breakdown rate, move rate and stack rate. The operating rates are highest while standby without crew rate and equipment breakdown rate are the lowest. It is thus evident that the appellant is charging fixed amount of US $ 1,05,000/- per day for supply of drilling rigs and US $ 8,000/- (1,13,000 - 1,05,000) per day for the crew and other related services as discussed in Para 6 supra. Therefore, said contract is not simply for supply of drilling rigs but also for service of 'Mining of mineral, oil or gas'. Thus, the contract is for composite services. 10.6 Section 65A of Fin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Supreme Court in the case of Kemrock Industries & Exports Ltd. v. CCE [2007 (210) ELT 497 (SC)] held that fiber glass reinforced plastic (FRP) sheets are classifiable under Chapter 39 and not Chapter 70 because stiffness of such sheets gives them essential character. Similarly, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE v. Naga Ltd. [2007 (212) ELT 452 (SC)] has held that Vim Dish wash Bar, a mixture of OSAA and abrasive powder is classifiable under heading 3405.40 as abrasive powder because essential character of the product is scouring. The aforesaid judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court are applicable in the present case for classification of the service provided by the appellant. The essential character of the service provided by the appellant is 'Mining of mineral, oil or gas' and not 'Supply of tangible goods'. Therefore, service provided by them has been correctly classified as 'Mining of mineral, oil or gas' by applying essentiality test as per clause (b) of Section 65 A of the Finance Act, 1994. 10.9 In the case of N. Rajashekar & Co. v. CCE [2008] 16 STT 130 (Bang. - CESTAT), wherein the appellant was involved in transporting limestone boulders from outside the mine site to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....liance on the format of agreement and work order giving a different nomenclature shall not help the appellant denying its liability stating that the activity carried out by the Appellant was not 'cargo handling service' when a combined reading of Section 65(23), 65(105)(zr) of the Act is made.' The aforesaid judgment is applicable in the instant case because the equipments used by M/s Atwood was an aid to perform the service of 'mining of minerals, oil or gas'. Thus, the service provided by M/s Atwood would not fall under 'Supply of tangible goods for use' service, but will fall under 'Mining of Mineral, oil or gas'. 10.11 M/s Atwood has also placed reliance on the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Indian National Shipowners Association (supra) wherein the services provided by the petitioner i.e. providing vessels on time charter basis to various oil and gas producers was held to be falling under section 65(105) (zzzzj) i.e supply of tangible goods for use' and not under section 65(105)(zzzy) which pertains to 'mining of mineral, oil and gas'. Para 37 of the order is reproduced below:- 'Entry (zzzzj) is entirely a new entry. Whereas entry (zzzy) covers services....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onstruction barges support offshore construction, provide accommodation, crane support and stoppage area on main deck or equipment. Their harbor tugs are deployed for piloting big vessels in and out of the harbor and for husbanding main fleet. All these activities are not related to mining. This has also been accepted by the Hon'ble High Court in Para 48 of the order, which is reproduced below- 'Applying the above conclusions to the instant case, we hold that the services rendered by the members of the 1st petitioner are either pre-mining or post-mining activities. They have no direct relation to mining. They were, therefore, rightly not brought to tax till entry (zzzzj) was introduced to cover transport of tangible goods by sea without transferring right of possession and effective control thereof. The services rendered by the members of the 1st petitioner are covered by entry (zzzzj) because they inter alia supply vessels, offshore support vessels, barges, tugs etc. without transferring right of possession and effective control over them. In contrast entry (zzzy) was introduced to comprehensively bring under the service tax net activities having a direct nexus to mining activi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rvice tax with effect from 01.06.2007 on their invoices clearly shows that the appellant was fully aware that he was required to pay service tax with effect from 01.06.2007, the date on which 'Mining of minerals, oil or gas' service was brought under the service tax net. In view of this factual position, the contention of the appellant that they had bonafide belief that their service is chargeable to service tax under 'Supply of tangible goods service' is totally wrong. This fact clearly shows that they had bonafide belief that their service is chargeable to service tax under 'Mining of mineral, oil or gas service' with effect from 01.06.2007. In spite of such bonafide belief, they did not pay service tax by way of suppression of facts, willful mis-statement and contravention of provisions of Finance Act, 1994 with intent to evade service tax. Therefore, extended period of limitation has been correctly invoked for demand of service tax. (iv) Further, M/s GSPC had engaged another contractor viz M/s Deep Drilling India Pvt. Ltd for drilling the exploratory wells in the same exploration block. M/s Deep Drilling had obtained the necessary Service Tax registration and were disc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... this is the case, there will not be any confirmation of demand invoking extended period and consequently no penalty under Section 78. This will clearly render the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act otiose. Such an interpretation which makes certain provisions of statute redundant, is not permitted to be taken. That is why Commissioner, though having extended the benefit of Section 80, confirmed the demand under extended period. (vii) Further, the following decisions hold that 'blind belief' cannot be cited as excuse for bonafide belief:- (a) Winner System v. CCE&C - 2005 (191) ELT 1051 (Tri. - Mum.) (b) Tanzeem Screen Arts v. CCE 2006 (196) ELT 209 (Tri. - Mum.) (c) Interscape v. CCE 2006 (198) ELT 275 (Tri) (d) Camlin Ltd. v. CCE 2009 (239) ELT 346 (Tri) (viii) Similarly, it has been consistently held by various judicial for a that 'ignorance of law' is no excuse. In this regard, the following decisions are cited:- (a) R.G. Nagori & Sons v. CCE 1989 (39) ELT 303 (Tri) (b) Sindhu Resettlement Corpn. Ltd. v. CCE 2000 (118) ELT 182 (Tri - Delhi) (c) CCE v. Bindal Cotex (P.) Ltd. 2004 (165) ELT ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o survey and exploration would, however, fall within the ambit of taxable service. It was submitted that this was the intention of the Government and therefore this clarification has to be treated as contemporanea exposito and therefore, keeping in view the preamble of the contract and the observation of the Ministry in the letter, it becomes quite clear that the action of the M/s. Atwood in providing the service of drilling, testing of exploratory wells is classifiable under this service. Since M/s. Atwood has been entrusted to drill, test and complete exploratory well, the service provided is covered by the definition. Further, Revenue has also relied upon the definition of exploratory wells given in certain websites. Revenue has also relied upon the statement of Shri Vishal D. Rathore, Drilling Engineer of GSPC, who agreed that commercial production not yet started. Several decisions as well as references of the Ministry were cited to submit that subsequent to introduction of mining service and SOTG service would not take the service provided by the M/s. Atwood out of purview of the service of 'Survey and Exploration of Mineral, Oil and Gas Service' prior to 01.6.2007. 12. We....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e less dense than their precursors, which causes overpressure; the hydrocarbons are lighter medium, and so migrate upwards due to buoyancy, and the fluids expand as further burial causes increased heating. Most hydrocarbons migrate to the surface as oil seeps, but some will get trapped. * Trap - The hydrocarbons are buoyant and have to be trapped within a structural (e.g. Anticline, fault block) or stratigraphic trap. * Seal or cap rock - The hydrocarbon trap has to be covered by an impermeable rock known as a seal or cap-rock in order to prevent hydrocarbons escaping to the surface * Reservoir - The hydrocarbons are contained in a reservoir rock. This is a porous sandstone or limestone. The oil collects in the pores within the rock. The reservoir must also be permeable so that the hydrocarbons will flow to surface during production.' These are the five elements which are required to be complied with to identify source of potential petroleum Hydrocarbon drill location. In our opinion, this is what is covered by the definition of Survey and Exploration as far as oil/gas is concerned. 12.2 Further, it is settled ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rding to M/s. Atwood, their service is specifically covered by supply of tangible goods including machinery, equipments and appliances for use and therefore , a specific service has to be preferred to a general service and therefore, the service provided by them cannot be classified under 'Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas Service'. 13.3 First of all, when we see the definition, to be classified under this service, it is not necessary that the activity has to be 'Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas'. As per the definition, any service provided by any person to any person in relation to Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas would be covered under this service. 13.4 The question that arises therefore is whether supply of drilling rigs prior to 16.5.2008, when there was no service of 'Supply of Tangible goods' in the statute books can be covered by the Mining Service. We have already seen the preamble to the contract. In the case of Oil or Gas, after the Survey and Exploration, drilling activity starts and if the well is found to be successful and if there is sufficient quantity of Hydrocarbon, Gas or Oil, the well is not abandoned but the same well is used for exploitation successfully. This is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l in the case of Kopran Limited (supra), is appropriate. 13.7 As per the Mines Act, 1952, the word 'mines' is defined as 'Mine' means, any excavation where any operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has been or is being carried on and includes - (i) all borings, bore holes, oil wells and accessory crude conditioning plants, including the pipe conveying mineral oil within the oil fields; (ii) all shafts, in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine, where in the course of being sunk or not; (iii) all levels and inclines planes in the course of being driven; (iv) all opencast workings; (v) all conveyors or aerial ropeways provided for the bringing into or removal from a mine or minerals or other articles or for the removal of refuse there from; (vi) all adits, levels, planes, machinery works, railways, tramways and sidings in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine; (vii) all protective works being carried out in or adjacent to a mine; (viii) all workshop and store situated within the precincts of a mine and the same management and used primarily for the purposes connected with that mine ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he equipments always remained in possession of M/s. Atwood at all times. (iii) The contract is for supply of drilling rigs and other equipments as is seen from the fact that contractor charges specific amount on per day basis and not based on usage and separate rates are provided even for standby. (iv) Equipments were given by the contractor for use during the term specified in contract and not for drilling predefined number of wells. (v) M/s. Atwood also relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Indian National Shipowners Association (supra), wherein it was held that providing vessels on time charter basis to various Oil and Gas producers were held to be supply of Tangible Goods and not under 'Mining of Mineral, Oil and Gas'. (vi) They also relied upon the decision in the case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. (supra) to contend that there is no transfer of possession and effective control where the supplier's employees are operating the equipment. (vii) CBEC has clarified vide JS (TRU)'s DO letter dated 29.2.2008 that supply of tangible goods for use may involve transfer of possession and effective control of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....king note of the fact that M/s. Atwood started their operation from November 2006, the approach adopted by them would show that they were not interested in entering into litigation and believed in paying the taxes. It was submitted by the learned counsel for M/s. Atwood that even though they believed that they had a case for non-payment of tax prior to 16.5.2008, to avoid litigation they had paid the entire amount of service tax due with interest. The observation of Commissioner in Para 162 are relevant and are reproduced below:- '162. However, I find that the said assessee has shown its bonafide by rendering full cooperation to the department in the investigation and also making goods the liability immediately on being pointed out. The fact that they have already paid the service tax along with interest much before the issuance of show cause notice and they have borne the incidence of tax on their shoulders, is sufficient evidence to show that the reasons for not paying the service tax by the assessee were the technical/ legal reasons rather than wilful suppression with an intent to evade payment of service tax. The law in this regard was not very clear which is evident from th....