2012 (10) TMI 413
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Saiyed, Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri S.K. Mall, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order].- Vide Order No. S/408 to 412/WZB/05-C-IV, dated 5-7-2005 [2006 (205) E.L.T. 177 (Tri. - Mumbai)], the appellants were directed to deposit entire amount of duty demanded and the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit vide Order No. A/1410-1414/WZB/05/C-V/SMB, dated ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntical situation and therefore, the appeal may be restored without insisting on deposit of balance dues. 3. I have considered the submissions made by the ld. Consultant. I find that the ld. Consultant is arguing the case on merit. However, ld. SDR submitted that in the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Kiritkumar J. Shah v. C.C.E., Nagpur - 2009 (242) E.L.T. 222 (Tri.-Mum.), it has b....
TaxTMI