Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (9) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) No. SKSS/285-286/SRT-II/2010, dated 30-12-10, rejecting the department's appeal. M/s. Millat Fibres, Surat were alleged to have diverted duty free inputs. Appropriate Customs duty was confirmed with equivalent penalty and ordering interest vide OIO No. 01/SNP-ADC/OA/2008-09, dated 9-1-09. However, the adjudicating author....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....obtaining re-warehousing licence and licence to manufacture, under bond under Sections 58 & 65 of Customs Act, 1962, have inter alia undertaken to observe all provisions of Customs Act, 1962, Central Excise Act, 1944 and rules made thereunder. Therefore, the said bond is available for enforcing and for recovery of any fine. Revenue again relied upon the Hon'ble Apex Court's judgment supra, holding....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Now, coming to the issue of enforcing bond, it was canvassed by the Revenue that the unit had executed G-17 bond and all liabilities against 100% EOU are being covered by this bond. I find that the unit had executed a bond while obtaining warehousing licence and to manufacture for working as EOU. However, no bond was executed for release of the goods confiscated and no redemption fine was imposed ....