Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 505

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Naidu, SDR, for the respondents   The appellants are challenging the levy of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, on account of wrong availment of 100% Cenvat Credit on capital goods during the period July, 2008.   2. The facts of the case are that in July, 2008, the appellants wrongly availed 100% cenvat credit on capital goods. As they were not entitled to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... it was detected during the audit. Therefore, the appellants have contravened the provisions of Section 11AC of the Act and therefore, they are liable to pay penalty on the same. As in the show cause notice itself, it has been stated that the appellants have availed cenvat credit wrongly, therefore the provisions of Section 11AC are not attracted although, they have violated the provisions of Sect....