Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (7) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fully submits the following grounds of objection: Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 12(1) New Delhi ("the Learned AO") under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the Act, on the directions of the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution Panel ('Hon'ble DRP') is bad in law and void ab- initio.   1.1 That on facts and in law, while passing the assessment order, the Learned AD has erred in computing the total income of the Appellant at Rs. 46,64,427 as against returned income of Rs 12,17,712 and therefore, the order of the Learned AO is bad in law and needs to be annulled. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble DRP has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of the undertaking while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Act. Therefore, excluding the profit on disposal of assets twice is not justified. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble DRP and thereafter the Learned AO has erred in not passing a speaking order thus violating principles of natural justice. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned AO erred in charging interest under section 234B of the Act. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned AO has erred in initiating penalty proceedings under section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act. The above grounds of appeal are mutually exclusive & without prejudice to each other. The Appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se of calculation of exempt profit u/s 10A of the Act.   4. The Ld AR argued before us that interest on fixed deposit and profit on disposal of assets has already been reduced from computation of income for the calculation of exempt profit u/s 10A. In this respect, he took us to page 2 of the paper book, where he invited our attention towards the reduction made while calculating the exempt income u/s 10A. As regards misc. income of Rs. 9,35,639/-, the Ld AR argued that misc. income has arisen during the course of business of assessee and is therefore part of business profits of the assessee eligible for deduction u/s 10A. In this respect he relied upon the judgment of ITAT Delhi Benches in the case of Birla Software India Ltd. v. DCIT....