Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deposit and stay of recovery. After hearing both sides, I am of the view that the appeal itself requires to be summarily disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with predeposit, I take up the appeal. 2. In adjudication of a show-cause notice, the Assistant Commissioner confirmed demand and ordered recovery of Rs.3,64,361/- from the assessee under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Ex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal filed by M/s. Mysore Cements Ltd., (Presently Heidelberg Cements India Ltd.) Post-Ammasandra, Dist: Tumkur - 572 211, against the Order-in-Original No.16/2010 dated 20/05/2010 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, 'A' Division, for non-compliance of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 3.1. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that their appeal in Form No.ST-4 was f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. 3.2. In support of the above submissions, ld. Counsel has relied on Vikram Ispat Vs. CCE, Khandeshwa, Navi Mumbai [2009 (238) ELT 776 (Tri. Mumbai)]. 4. The DR points out that the party's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act and therefore the limitation provisions of that section were righ....