Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (6) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deposit and stay of recovery. After hearing both sides, I am of the view that the appeal itself requires to be summarily disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with predeposit, I take up the appeal. 2. In adjudication of a show-cause notice, the Assistant Commissioner confirmed demand and ordered recovery of Rs.3,64,361/- from the assessee under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Ex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal filed by M/s. Mysore Cements Ltd., (Presently Heidelberg Cements India Ltd.) Post-Ammasandra, Dist: Tumkur - 572 211, against the Order-in-Original No.16/2010 dated 20/05/2010 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, 'A' Division, for non-compliance of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 3.1. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that their appeal in Form No.ST-4 was f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. 3.2. In support of the above submissions, ld. Counsel has relied on Vikram Ispat Vs. CCE, Khandeshwa, Navi Mumbai [2009 (238) ELT 776 (Tri. Mumbai)]. 4. The DR points out that the party's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act and therefore the limitation provisions of that section were righ....