Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... pre-deposit of an amount of Rs.21,59,264/- confirmed as duty demand, interest thereof and penalty under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.   2. The above said amounts have been confirmed by the adjudicating authority on the ground that the appellant had been unable to produce Project Authority Certificate (PAC) and also on the ground that the 2 PACs were having same number, hence duplic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en a certificate, giving the reasoning for duplication of same number.   5. Ld.SDR submits that these papers were not produced before the authorities.   6. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of the papers produced by the ld.Counsel, we find that the issue needs to be factually appreciated by the adjudicating authority. The papers which were produ....