2012 (5) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rishna Mohan Menon and M.P. Devanath, Advs. for the Appellant   Harish Chandra, Sr. Adv.; Ajay Sharma, Naresh Kaushik, Arvind Kumar Sharma and Shreekant N. Terdal, Advs. for the Respondent   JUDGEMENT   1. Applications for amendment of cause title is allowed in terms of prayer (a). Cause title has been amended accordingly.   2. These appeals by the assessee, under S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uld suffice to note that the question of law raised in these appeals relates to the determination of the cost of raw material in the assessable value of the final product for the purpose of levy of Excise duty.   5. At the very outset, it is urged by Mr. Lakshmikumaran , learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants that the main order dated 31st May, 2006, passed by the Tribunal w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion on merits.   6. Mr. Harish Chandra, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, on the other hand, submits that since the main issue arising in these appeals has been dealt with by the Tribunal, in the light of the decision of this Court in Ujagar Prints v. Union of India and Others 1988 (38) ELT 535, no useful purpose would be served by remanding the case back to the T....