Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (6) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of entry No. 686223 dated 19-9-2009 and they classified the printers under Heading No. 8471.60 of the Customs Tariff. The importer sought exemption from MRP (Maximum Retail Price) based CVD on the ground that they are the actual users of the goods. However, on examination of the goods, it was noticed that they were in pre-packed condition having declared MRP on them and therefore, were covered under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and accordingly, the goods were leviable to Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) on the basis of retail sale price. The goods were assessed to duty accordingly and differential duty on account of CVD on MRP basis amounting to Rs. 5,86,007/- was confirmed. 2.2 The ld. Commissioner also confiscate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing 8471.60 of the Customs Tariff or 8473.30 as the case may be. Neither the description nor the classification has been challenged or modified by the Customs authorities in the assessment proceedings. Further, they had declared the transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act in the bill of entry as per the invoice given from the foreign supplier and this value has also been accepted by the Customs for the purposes of assessment. Therefore, they have not mis-declared the value or any other material particulars in respect of the goods so as to attract the provisions of 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. It is true that they have sought to assess the CVD not on the MRP basis and this is only an inadvertent error. Therefore, confiscati....