2011 (5) TMI 788

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order]. - This revision application has been filed by the Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur against the orders-in-appeal No. 426-CE/APPL/KNP/2008, dated 21-12-08 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Kanpur. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent M/s. A.G. Enterprises, Agra has filed a rebate claim for Rs. 1,02,242/- and Rs. 84,441/- respe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y has been filed or shall be filed and no drawback of duty shall be claimed. 2.1 The department during the course of scrutiny of the rebate claim observed from the shipping bill Nos. 1761986 dated 3-9-07 and 1752053, dated 6-8-07 that the merchant exporter has claimed drawback on the goods in question which were exported under ARE-2 No. 03/2007-08, dated 9-9-07 and ARE-2 No. 02/2007-08 dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder duty drawback Scheme, drawback is granted without verifying the fact whether inputs in the said export goods had suffered Central Excise duty/countervailing duty. Accordingly, such distinction should not be made for granting rebate where rebate is barred due to the fact that claim of duty drawback has been taken. 4.2 That the applicant wish that their total defence reply be considered....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alf of the applicant who reiterated the grounds of revision application. 7. Government has carefully gone through the relevant case records and perused the impugned order-in-original and order-in-appeal. 8. The issue to be decided is whether rebate of excise duty paid on inputs is inadmissible when the benefit of drawback has been claimed on the exported goods. 9. Governmen....