Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 1173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ht to quash the order dated 11.2.2009 at Annexure-B; order dated 23.3.2010 at Annexure-D passed by the 1st respondent; issue a writ of prohibition restraining the 2nd respondent from proceeding to recover the outstanding demand of interest charged under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short IT Act) and, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act was not paid since he was seeking waiver by making an application to the 1st respondent under Section 119(2)(a) of the IT Act. The 1st respondent rejected the application except giving relief by waiving interest under Section 234A of the IT Act to the extent levied, retaining the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the IT Act vide Annexure-B. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er of Income Tax Which he failed to exercise, much less, he has not assigned any reasons to opine that the assessee is not entitled for the exemption as per Section 234-B and 234-C of the IT Act.   6. Sri M.V. Sheshachala, learned standing counsel for the respondents submitted that the circular does not apply to the case on hand. Therefore, he contended at the most, against the impugned orde....