Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (3) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order of assessment, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax assessed the total income of the Petitioner at Rs.22.43 crores, resulting in a demand of Rs.2,00,48,630/. The Petitioner filed a rectification application under Section 154 on 5 January 2012. Upon rectification, the demand has been scaled down from Rs.2 crores to Rs.1.30 crores. Thereafter, upon a second rectification application dated 30 January 2012, the demand has been further scaled down to Rs.1.18 crores. A refund was due to the Petitioner for Assessment Year 201011 approximately in the amount of Rs.78 lakhs. The Petitioner has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the order of assessment. An application for stay was moved before the Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the Assessing Officer for previous years. However, for the year in question, the addition which has been made would result in an increase by 3700% in the annual letting value. As regards (iii), it has been stated that the expenses which were incurred in the amount of Rs.1.20 crores were towards legitimate professional expenditure, including towards international conferences, institution of a chair in conjunction with the International Fiscal Association (IFA) and to the Government Law College at Mumbai. In these circumstances, it was submitted that the action of the Revenue is completely arbitrary. On the other hand, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue submitted that the refund of Assessment Year 201011 was adjusted against the ....