TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2011 (9) TMI 649
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n: This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No.183 to 184/ 2006/135 to 136 (Raj)/Commr.(A)/ RP/Raj, dt.21.3.06. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the Central Excise officers visited the factory premises of current appellant and conducted the checks. On conclusion of checks and investigations, it was noticed that there was a shortage of finished goods as a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y for re-quantification of the duty liability based upon the findings recorded by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) at Para 8 of the impugned order. It is his submission that consequent to such directions, the Jt.Commissioner has confirmed the demand of duty of Rs.55,892/- (Rupees Fifty Five Thousands, Eight hundred and Ninety Two only) and interest thereof along with equivalent amount of penalty und....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... prayer of the appellant before him as regards re-quantification of duty liability based upon the value to be considered as cum-duty price. We perused the Order-in-Original No.28/JC/2006, dt.29.12.06 passed by the adjudicating authority consequent to the impugned order before us. The adjudicating authority has confirmed the demand of duty of Rs.9,52,892/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs, Fifty Two Thousands, E....