Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2011 (7) TMI 693

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of this court :   "(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.2,06,23,367 made by the Assessing Officer by treating the deposits received by the assessee against settlement pending as income of the assessee despite the fact that the assessee is maintaining its accounts on cash basis.   (ii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,06,23,367 made by the Assessing Officer accepting the method of accounting followed by the assessee which results in postponement of its tax liability as per the discretion of the assessee, s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d unless the accounts were finally settled with the defaulting borrowers, it was difficult to apportion the interim receipts between the principal and the interest.   5. Though the appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed by the Tribunal, vide the order dated October 15, 2010, on other aspects, qua the issue under discussion it put its seal of affirmation on the observations of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), noticed above.   6. Still aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal before us.   7. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and have perused the record.   8. Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal were not justified in del....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ime of final settlement had not been done, the bifurcation could not be made. Therefore, the amounts were lying credited in the relevant year of final settlement as per the accounting policy regularly followed by the assessee regarding the amount received from the defaulting borrowers for bifurcation into the principal and the interest thereon. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has observed that unless the accounts are finally settled with the defaulting borrowers, it is difficult to apportion the interim receipts between the principal and the interest. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has also recorded a finding that such accounting system has been regularly followed by the assessee. In our considered opinion, having regard ....