2011 (4) TMI 803

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri S.k.Bhaskar, SDR   PER: M.VEERAIYAN   This appeal is by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) by which denial of credit amounting to Rs.1,61,915/- on cement and steel used for fabrication of storage tank was upheld.   2. Heard both sides.   3. Learned Advocate, referring to show cause, submits that the credit used on cement and M.S.Bars....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra 39 of the said judgement.   4. Learned DR reiterates the findings and reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals). He submits that cement and M.S.Bars have been used for masonry work of storage tank. This might be used in the fabrication of storage tank and which might be part of the permanent structure and therefore these inputs are not eligible for benefit of cenvat credit and he also rel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ctory in relation to manufacture of final products, namely, synthetic yarn.   6. Para 39 of the judgment of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. vs. CCE, Raipur reads as under:-   There are other details to the Cenvat scheme and we note that the definition of capital goods primarily includes machinery items; components, spares and accessories of the s....