Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (12) TMI 638

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - These applications and appeals are by the department, represented by the learned SDR. There is no representation for the respondent despite notice, nor any request of theirs for adjournment. After examining the records and hearing the SDR, we note that these proceedings are against a common order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The first appeal filed by the depa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has also relied on the Hon'ble High Court's judgment in Ambuja Cements Ltd. v. Union of India - 2009 (236) E.L.T. 431 (P & H) = 2009 (14) S.T.R. 3 (P & H) wherein the above circular of the Board was examined and it was held that, if three conditions were fulfilled, Cenvat credit of service tax paid on GTA service availed for transportation of excisable goods from the factory to the customer's pre....