2008 (6) TMI 370

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ramachandran Nair, J.]. - This appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act is against the order of the CESTAT allowing the appeal filed by the respondent, by which demand raised on them and confirmed in first appeal was cancelled by the Tribunal. 2. In spite of service of notice, respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court. Ther....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and cleared by the respondent, they claimed the benefit of notification No. 16/97, which provides for exemption to SSI units. Since respondent was not engaged in the manufacture of the items cleared, duty was demanded on the final product by disallowing exemption under Notification No. 16/97. Even though demand was confirmed in first appeal. Tribunal reversed the same and cancelled the demand, ag....