Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (11) TMI 643

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ced below the minimum limit prescribed? (ii)    Whether the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be dropped without invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994? (iii)   Whether the Tribunal in, law was entitled to come to a conclusion regarding the unawareness regarding tax liability/bona fide on the face of the fact that they had collected Service Tax, with a finding of fact on this behalf? 2. The respondent assessee is holding Service tax registration under the category of "Construction service". The respondent had paid due Service tax alongwith interest for the period from April, 2007 to June, 2007, July, 2007 to September, 2007 and October, 2007 to December, 2007 late by 109 days, 14 da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tax Appeal No. 1367 of 2009 [2010 (19) S.T.R. 641 (Guj.) = 2010 (257) E.L.T. 37 (Guj.)] to submit that the controversy in issue stands concluded by the said decision in favour of the revenue. 4. Pursuant to the notice for final disposal issued by the Court, the respondent assessee has vide communication dated 5th October, 2010. requested that the matter be adjourned for a month or one and a half months to enable him to prepare his defence and reply in consultation with his lawyer. However, despite a period of more than one month having elapsed since the date of the said communication, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. 5. In the circumstances. Admit. The following substantial question of law arises for determin....