TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2011 (4) TMI 523
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eswaran, Advocates, for the Appellant. S/Shri Alok Yadav and M.P. Devanath, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard learned counsel for the parties on these appeals. 2. Our attention is drawn to the impugned judgment and order passed by CEGAT, West Regional Bench at Mumbai on 29-9-2000. By the said judgment, the two-judges Bench of the Tribunal, after referring to the Larger....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ity being a question of fact, the same is to be established in the facts of each case and not merely by showing the availability of an alternate scheme; (b) Where the Scheme opted for by the assessee is found to have been misused (in contradistinction to mere deviation or failure to observe all the conditions) the existence of an alternate scheme would not be an acceptable....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t appear to have been taken notice of or considered by the Division Bench of the Tribunal in the impugned judgment and order. A bare reading of the order of the Tribunal makes the position crystal clear that there is no proper discussion of all the factual issues arising for consideration. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has drawn our attention to the judgment of this Court ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tral Excise, Raigad, 2008 (225) E.L.T. 391 (Tri.-Mumbai). There is yet another decision of this court in Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills, 2009 (13) SCC 448 (sic) = 2009 (238) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) wherein also principles and circumstances in which extended period of limitation would be applicable have been discussed. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents, during the course ....