Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arghese, SC, C.B.E. & C., for the Respondent. [Judgment]. - The issue raised in these writ petitions are same and therefore these cases were heard and are disposed of by this judgment. 2. Petitioners are assessees under the Central Excise and Salt Act. Admittedly duty payable by the petitioners were paid by them belatedly. In such cases, Rule 96ZO of the Central Excise Rules framed u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that these writ petitions have been filed challenging the vires of the said rules. 3. Contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners is that the Rule does not give any discretion to the officer and therefore irrespective of the delay involved and irrespective of the guilt, the officer is mandatorily required to levy the penalty. This according to the learned counsel is unconstitutio....