Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2011 (1) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Judgment]. - The issue raised in these writ petitions are same and therefore these cases were heard and are disposed of by this judgment. 2. Petitioners are assessees under the Central Excise and Salt Act. Admittedly duty payable by the petitioners were paid by them belatedly. In such cases, Rule 96ZO of the Central Excise Rules framed under Section 37 of the Central Excise and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... challenging the vires of the said rules. 3. Contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners is that the Rule does not give any discretion to the officer and therefore irrespective of the delay involved and irrespective of the guilt, the officer is mandatorily required to levy the penalty. This according to the learned counsel is unconstitutional. 4. It is settled position of law ....