2011 (5) TMI 24
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hni & Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Advocates SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J (ORAL) 1. The captioned reference pertained to assessment year 1984-85. The reference is at the behest of the assessee. We have been called upon to adjudicate the following question of laws: (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT was legally justified in holding that only 50% of the total expenses....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ltants amounting to Rs 1,52,000/- holding the same to be of capital nature? (v) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Tribunal was legally justified in confirming the disallowance on travelling expenses amounting to Rs 10,974/- on the ground that it relates to new project and dos not relate to existing business? (vi) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... case, the Ld. ITAT was legally justified in holding that interests of Rs 40,18,498/- payable on the provisional retention price received as per the hon'ble Delhi High Court's order is not admissible deduction? (x) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT was legally justified in holding that expenditure on samples (Rs 1,40,376), export market development expenses....
TaxTMI