Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (8) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur (for short "the Tribunal") has been admitted on June 19, 2009 on the following substantial questions of law :   "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was legally justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 3 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained investment in hundis as undisclos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e and offered for taxation. During the course of hearing, the assessee submitted that the promissory notes/hundis found in the locker was only to the tune of Rs.18,35,000 and not Rs. 27,43,000. The assessee submitted that promissory notes belonged to different persons in the Chhugani family and in support he filed list of promissory notes of each of the family members and confirmation of loans tak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted the respondent herein, the respondent informed him that promissory notes were misplaced and thereafter since there was no need of money, he never approached the assessee for the same.   3. The Assessing Officer did not accept the explanation offered by the assessee regarding the above eighteen promissory notes and held that the assessee did advance a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs to Shri Chandumal ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cer accepted this fact. Further, none of the promissory notes are signed by any of the employees and under these circumstances there is no reason to disbelieve the assessee's explanation that the amount was not given as it was not signed by the proprietor of the said concern.   5. On the basis of the facts of the case, as explained by the Tribunal, and that findings of facts are not disputed....