Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner in de-novo proceedings, when the matter was earlier sent back by Tribunal vide its Order No.A/649/WZB/AHD/2009, dt.23.3.09. Vide said order, the Tribunal had classified the disputed product SHARKOFERROL against the claim of the appellant. However, the appellant s plea on limitation was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner with direction to quantify the duty demand withi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....extending the benefit of cum-duty-price.   4. Learned advocate does not dispute that such quantification done by the Commissioner is correct. The appellants cannot plead the matter again on merit when the issue stands finally decided by the earlier order and quantification done by the Commissioner, the correctness of which is not being disputed by the learned advocate.   5. In view of ....