Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a consideration of Rs. 2,13,33,320. On 10th November, 2009, the applicant entered into a share purchase agreement to sell these 5,33,333 shares to Geraldton Finance Limited, a Mauritius based company, for a consideration of Rs.5,59.99,965. The applicant realized capital gain of Rs.2,98.67.010. 2. The Applicant has approached this Authority to determine whether by virtue of being a Mauritius resident, it is eligible to the benefits of the India-Mauritius DTAA and hence not subject to tax in India on the capital gains realized. It has sought the ruling of this Authority on the following questions: 1.  Whether the application filed by the Applicant before the Authority of Advance Ruling is maintainable under section 245N of the Income-t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x under the laws of that state. In the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan reported in 263 ITR 706, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the certificate of residence issued by Mauritius Revenue Authority constitutes a valid and sufficient evidence of residential status under India - Mauritius DTAA. The CBDT in Circular No. 682 dated 30.03.1994 has further clarified that under the DTAA, a resident of Mauritius having income from alienation of shares of Indian company shall be liable to tax only in Mauritius. In the case of E*Trade Mauritius, AAR No. 862 of 2009, and, the Delhi ITAT in the case of Saraswati Holding Corporation, 2009, held the view that the gains arising out of alienation of shares of an Indian Company to a company who is a reside....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by a resident of Mauritius by alienation of shares of companies shall be taxable only in Mauritius according to Mauritius tax law. Therefore, any resident of Mauritius deriving income from alienation of shares of Indian companies will be liable to capital gains tax only in Mauritius as per Mauritius tax law and will not have any capital gains tax liability in India. 4. Paragraph 5 defines "alienation" to mean the sale, exchange transfer or relinquishment of the property or the extinguishment of any right in it or its compulsory acquisition under any law in force in India or in Mauritius." 7. Then there is further clarification issued by the CBDT regarding taxation of income from capital gains under the India-Mauritius DTAA through Circul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rtificate of residence is issued by the Mauritian authorities, such certificate will constitute sufficient evidence for accepting the status of residence as well as beneficial ownership for applying the DTAC accordingly. 3. The test of residence mentioned above would also apply in respect of income from capital gains on sale of shares. Accordingly, FIIs, etc. which are resident in Mauritius should not be taxable in India on income from capital gains arising in India on sale of shares as per paragraph 4 of article 13." 8. The issue that arises for consideration is that if we go by the I.T. Act the profit arising from the transfer of shares of Indian company is chargeable to capital gains tax under the Income-tax Act. However, the position ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ctions "subject to the provisions" of the Act. The very object of grafting the said two sections with the said clause is to enable the Central Government to issue a notification under section 90 towards implementation of the terms of the DTAs which would automatically override the provisions of the Income-tax Act in the matter of ascertainment of chargeability to income-tax and ascertainment of total income, to the extent of inconsistency with the terms of the DTAC. 3.1 The contention of the respondents which weighed with the High Court, viz., that the impugned Circular No.789 (see [2000] 243 ITR (St.)57) is inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, is a total non sequitur. As we have pointed out, Circular No.789 is a circular within th....