TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (2) TMI 480
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the case and in law, the hon'ble Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance made of Rs. 17,08,511 on account of interest expenses without appreciating the fact that the interest bearing loans obtained by the assessee from Canara Bank were diverted to settle the liability of its sister concern ? (b) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the hon'ble Tribu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....month. However, no lease rent was paid by the assessee to the trusts nor was it provided for in the books of account. It was the case of the assessee that there was an oral understanding that no rent was to be paid. By a further agreement datedMay 26, 1993, these two premises were sub-leased to Canara Bank at Rs.2,26,800 per month inclusive of water charges and taxes. No deposit was taken from the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n at the interest rate of 22.25 per cent. per annum. The assessee did not charge any interest from its sister concern Bihareeji International Ltd. 3. On the assessee's return for the assessment year 1997-98 the Assessing Officer concluded that the amount received from the bank had not been utilized for the purpose of business of the assessee-company and accordingly interest paid on this am....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Finley Mills reported in [1951] 20 ITR 475, as well as the judgment of this court in the case of Addl. CIT v. Putco Pvt. Ltd. reported in [1983] 140 ITR 740. It is seen that but for the borrowing of the funds, the assessee would not have been able to retain the business premises which would have been sold by the bank in the course of the recovery of its loan fo....