2008 (11) TMI 409
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant. [Order per : D.A. Mehta, J.]. - On 12-11-2008 when these Appeals came up for hearing the Court passed the following order : "During course of hearing various errors/defects have been noticed; one of the principal error being non-swearing of the affidavit accompanying each of the appeals and non-mentioning of the dates on which the appeal Memorandum has been signed and the affidavit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tters were called out, learned Counsel for the Appellants has placed on record X'erox copy of communication dated 24-11-2008 from the Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, HQ, Daman Commissionerate, Vapi addressed to the learned Counsel wherein with reference to letter dated 22-11-2008 of the Counsel, the Commissioner has stated - "With reference to the above, it is requested to withdraw the app....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....w. By way of illustration the facts from Tax Appeal No. 219 of 2008 may be noted. The Appellant is Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Daman. The Appeal Memorandum has been signed by the Appellant (Shri A.K. Pandey) without appending date on which the Appeal Memorandum has been signed. A X'erox copy of page No. 17 (the last page of Appeal Memorandum) is annexed herewith and forms part of thi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant. The Affidavit is neither sworn before Judicial Magistrate, nor an Executive Magistrate, nor a Notary Public, nor any other Gazetted Officer who is empowered to administer the oath. Thus the Affidavit is a mere sheet of paper without being an Affidavit as understood in legal parlance. 6. Similarly at page No. 19 the Verification is again signed by Assistant Commissioner, Central E....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI