TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1991 (12) TMI 257
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called as "the Act"). The petitioner is a manufacturer of industrial gases such as oxygen, acetylene, etc. It fills the gases produced by it in cylinders and sells to the customers. The terms and conditions subject to which the gases were sold by the petitioner establish that the gas cylinders in which the gas was sold were given on loan to customers for their use on a rent-free basis for a limited period only; after that stipulated period, rent per cylinder per day was charged by the petitioner. The petitioner contends that the said rent collected for use of the cylinder beyond the stipulated period, though described as "rent" in the terms and conditions, is not really rent chargeable under s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on loan to customers for their sole use only and for no other purpose at all and shall not be lent, hired, sold, transferred, refilled or used for any purpose other than storage of the gas compressed therein by the company". Condition No. 3 states that the cylinders are supplied on free loan basis for a limited period and that after the said period a nominal rent per cylinder per day will be charged and that the rent will be charged in the case of lost or misplaced cylinders till their return or till the company is paid the full replacement value. Condition No. 7 states that further supplies (of gases) in company's cylinders will not be made until the empties are received back. Condition No. 13 states that gases may be supplied in custo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....heir sole use only" it is not necessary to enquire further into the matter because it is the intention of the petitioner that is material. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the amount that was collected was treated as rental charges for the use of the cylinders beyond the stipulated period till they were returned. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision of this Court in State Bank of India v. State of Andhra Pradesh [1988] 70 STC 215, wherein the question that arose was whether hire charges recovered by the bank on its lockers were attracted by section 5-E of the Act. This Court held that no power was conferred on the sales tax authorities to levy sales tax in respect of hire charges collected by banks for prov....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....censee without possession of the goods. None of these considerations arise on the facts of the present case. The cylinders were goods and they were actually being handed over to the customers by the petitioner, and the customers were having physical possession of the cylinders. The learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks support from the decision of this Court in Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer [1990] 77 STC 182. The question which fell for consideration in that case was whether sales tax was exigible under section 5-E of the Act on the hire charges collected by Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (the assessee) for the use of the sophisticated machinery supplied by it to its contractors engaged by it for execution o....