1990 (12) TMI 295
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ction 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987, along with a prayer for interim order. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned State Representative. The case of the applicant is that the applicant carries on the business of manufacturing television sets and other articles. Production in the factory of the applicant started on and from November 5, 1987. The first sal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... quashed. The respondent No. 2 was directed to hear the application for grant of eligibility certificate afresh. By that order dated June 11, 1990, this Tribunal directed the respondent No. 2 to hear the application for grant of eligibility certificate after giving reasonable opportunity to the applicant of being heard. By that order the respondent No. 2 was directed to dispose of the application ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esentative wants to controvert the allegation in paragraph 14 of the application of the petitioner to the effect that the previous application for grant of eligibility certificate is still pending before the respondent No. 2. He verbally prays for granting liberty to the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition in the matter. After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learne....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ificate is pending, the factum of pendency of that application cannot stand in the way of issuance of declaration forms in accordance with law. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that when the respondent No. 2 refused to accept applications for grant of declaration forms, the applicant would file afresh applications for grant of declaration forms by December 10, 1990. If such applicatio....
TaxTMI