2009 (11) TMI 806
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. ORDER This is an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. 124-CE/07 dated 4-10-07 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the penalty of Rs. 5,46,448/- imposed on the respondent. 2. Heard the learned DR. None appears for the respondent in spite of notice. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the respondents failed to pay the duty for the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd perused records. It is not a case of unaccounted production and clandestine removal. The respondents have admittedly entered the production in the record and cleared the same raising invoices as provided in the Central Excise Rules and they have also submitted the monthly returns. Undoubtedly, there was delay for payment of the dues and the same stands paid along with interest. Under these circ....
TaxTMI