Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1986 (11) TMI 367

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessment year 1978-79 in respect of the proceedings under the U.P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for that year. During the assessment year in question the assessee dealt in brassware and E.P.N.S. ware. A perusal of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal shows that the only reason for discarding the book version of the accounts of the dealer was a parcha which was recove....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n so far as the material in which parcha No. 5 was recovered on 10th September, 1979, is concerned, the relevant entry with regard to the issue of raw materials and the receipt of finished products does find place in the kargar register of the assessee. The department was, however, labouring under an erroneous impression that such issue of raw materials is to find place in the account books of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal that under the aforesaid parcha recovered on 10th September, 1979, there was suppression of sale to the extent of Rs. 46,000 and, therefore, the Tribunal was not justified in its impugned order in not estimating sale at a higher figure than Rs. 46,000. Hence the said order deserves to be set aside and the case remanded back to the Tribunal for redetermination of the estimated suppressed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he cost of this raw material amounting to Rs. 46,000 is liable to tax or not. It is not a case of discovery of any suppression of sales. Hence there arises no question of setting aside the impugned order of the Tribunal. In my opinion, there is considerable force in the submission made on behalf of the dealer. Admittedly the issue of raw material to Dulha Jaan as found in the parcha recovered on ....