Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 829

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... This is an appeal filed by the Department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) modifying the order of the Original Authority by setting aside confiscation and reducing the penalty. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the officers visited at respondent's premises on 31-1-2006 and found the stock of finished goods viz. PVC Pipes as per record to be 56,805 Kg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad substantial quantity of unaccounted stock and no proper accounts were maintained. The same would have been removed clandestinely but for the timely visit by the officers. Therefore, he submits that setting aside of confiscation was not proper and seeks the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) be set aside and the order of the Original Authority be restored. 5. Ld. Co. Secretary submits that the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s no evidence about such attempt and that there was no evidence of clandestine removal in the past relied upon. In a case involving substantial excess quantity, clearly a failure to maintain proper accounts is established and the confiscation of unaccounted goods require to be upheld. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner in setting aside the confiscation appears to be not legal and proper. At ....