Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1986 (2) TMI 303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act, 1959. The question referred to us for our determination is as follows: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in law in coming to the conclusion that the paper reels of smaller width sold by the respondent were not a commercially different commodity from the paper rolls of bigger width from which they were prepared by the process of slitting the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....idth carried out by the assessee did not amount to manufacture under section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and hence there was no contravention of the recitals of form 14 and no purchase tax under section 14 was payable?" 2.. The assessee is the same as the assessee in S.T.R. No. 72 of 1980 (Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Paper Process Works [1986] 62 STC 317) decided by us on 20th Febru....