Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (4) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant is a dealer in purchase and sale of motor cars on hire-purchase agreement basis and when that car as sold was being used by the appellant for business purposes?" 2.. The material facts giving rise to this reference briefly are as follows: The assessee carries on business of financing hire-purchase transactions in motor vehicles. While framing assessment for the assessment year 1970-71, the assessing authority found that the assessee had sold a car for Rs. 40,000. The assessing authority held that this amount was liable to be included in the taxable turnover of the assessee. In the appeal preferred by the assessee before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the finding of the assessing authority was affirmed. In the second appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at case, the finding by the Tribunal was that the car which was sold by the assessee was not used as ancillary to the assessee's business. In the instant case, however, the contention of the assessee before the Tribunal was that the car in question was for the office use of the assessee and that its sale proceeds were not exigible to tax as the assessee was not a dealer in cars. That is why in the question referred to this Court it is stated that the car was used by the assessee for business purposes and we must, therefore, proceed on the basis that the finding of the Tribunal is that the car was used by the assessee for business purposes. In Misc. Civil Case No. 129 of 1981. (Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Ratlam Strawboard Mills Private Ltd....