Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 797

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upees Five lakhs only) under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. (ii) Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs only) under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Order-in-Original No. 84/2008-C.E., dated 31-12-2008 in respect of Appeal No. E/St/226/2009 in E/329/2009 (i)  Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs only) penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The abovementioned penalties have been imposed by the Adjudicating Authority on the appellant on the ground that the appellant had only issued cenvatable invoices without delivery/dispatch of the materials covered under the invoices. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would draw our attention to the allegations in the show cause notice and submit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ise Rules, 2002. As regards the violation of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, it is her submission that the registered dealers are supposed to make an entry of the duty paying documents in the statutory records and subsequently issue the same. Since, they have taken credit of duty only, without receipt of the inputs from M/s. Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd., they are liable to penalization under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It is her submission that the appellant herein being a registered dealer should have been careful in accounting the receipts and the sales thereof. It is her submission that the appellant having not received any inputs, could not have sold the said inputs to M/s. Deccan Industries or any other further purchasers ....