2009 (12) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. ORDER The Appeal is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. IND-I/130/2007 dated 28-6-2007. Cross objection No. 15 of 2008 is connected to this appeal. 2. Heard ld. SDR for the Department. None appears for the respondent. However, there is a communication dated 31-8-2009 seeking decision on merits. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the respondents a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pulated under the said Notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal of the party with the following findings :- "5. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by the Appellant and on examination of the documents submitted by them, I find that as rightly pointed out by them this is not a case of refund of Cenvat Credit or rebate of excise duty (input stage rebate) but a ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er Fibre & Viscose Fibre used in the production of exported goods as if such usage is not permissible and that the Appellant have to pay the excise duty on such excess goods (even though they are in nature of duty paid goods procured by Appellant) used in production of export goods. At least when the Appellant applied for refund the Department/Adjudicating Authority should have been courteous enou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that they are very much eligible to the refund of duty claimed by them." 4. Ld. SDR reiterated the grounds of appeal. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions and perused the records. At the outset, it is to be noted that SION norms are based on average consumption in the industry. The actual consumption by any manufacturer could be more or less. If the variation is very wide then it ....