2009 (9) TMI 848
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tes and M.N. Saiyed, Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri S.K. Mall, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER The prayer in the application is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty amount of Rs. 14.38 Crores (approximately), along with imposition of penalty of identical amount. As per facts on record, the appellant is 100% EOU. The duty stands confirmed against them in respect of duty free....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....demand was raised under Section 11A, the same is required to be confirmed under Rule 192 read with Rule 196 of the Central Excise Rules, which do not provide any time limit. He has also observed that demand would not be vitiated by mere non mention or wrong mention of provisions of law. 3. Our attention has been drawn to the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court judgment in the case of UP State Cement Cor....