Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1980 (2) TMI 233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....two connected applications under section 15(2)(b) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The parties are the same, so also the points arising therein. Only the assessment periods are different. The period in case No. 42 of 1979 is from 27th October, 1973, to 13th November, 1974, and in case No. 43 of 1979 from 8th November, 1972, to 26th October, 1973. The asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ajasthan, which, by a common order dated 28th April, 1978, allowed both the revisions and held that, "neel" was not a pigment and was, consequently, taxable at the rate of 7 per cent. Dissatisfied with the order of the Board the assessing authority filed applications under section 15(1) of the Act for stating a case and referring the question of law arising out of its order to this Court for deci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be pointed out that a question of law cannot be said to have been finally settled unless there is a decision on the point either by this Court or the Supreme Court. An earlier decision of the Board cannot be taken to conclude the matter finally. It is remarkable that in case No. 42 of 1979 the Board has held on merits that "neel" is a pigment but out of sheer deference for the view taken in the o....