Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (12) TMI 741

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../s. Multiple Exports had submitted rebate claim to the Department and rebate claim was partly allowed. Part of the rebate claim amounting to Rs. 28,821/- was rejected on the ground that raw materials in respect of this consignment had not been received in view of the findings of investigation that the suppliers were non-existent. The Assistant Commissioner while rejecting the rebate claim attribut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4. 2. Heard both the sides. Learned DR relied upon the decision of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Almas Textiles vide Order No. A/693/WZB/AHD/2009 dated 1-4-2009 in support of his contention that in terms of decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of UOI v. Dharamendra Textile Processors - 2008 (231) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.), penalty equal to duty is imposable. On the other hand learned advoc....