Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1978 (8) TMI 216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be treated as a revision. Standing counsel has filed an affidavit of service on the assessee; but none has appeared. An ex parte assessment was made against the assessee and he deposited an amount of Rs. 3,682.02 before moving the application under section 30 for setting aside the ex parte order. An application under section 30 can be entertained in case a particular amount of tax is deposited b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roceedings were subsisting at the time when the assessee moved the application for restoration. The assessee had contended that no penalty had been imposed. This contention was not disputed before the Judge (Revisions). In case penalty proceedings were subsisting at the time the restoration application was made, the sales tax authorities could have easily produced the relevant records to establish....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....standing against the dealer. Rule 88 is specific, so far as cash security is concerned. It lays down that the tax or other amount payable by the dealer may be adjusted from cash security furnished by the dealer. A combined consideration of section 29(1) and rule 88 leaves little room for doubt that cash security deposited by a dealer can be adjusted towards the tax due. In the present case, as the....