Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1977 (3) TMI 138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g question to this court under section 11(3) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act: "Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the turnover in respect of photographs taken and supplied by the assessee are works contract?" When the matter came up before this court on an earlier occasion a supplementary statement of the case was called for. This has now been done. From the statement of the case as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... prints and albums was reduced from Rs. 52,000 to Rs. 40,000. The appellate authority, however, did not specify the break up of the extent of sales relating to photographs and those relating to albums. A revision was filed by the assessee against the appellate order and the revising authority estimated the sales of photographs at Rs. 38,000 and that of albums and corners thereof at Rs. 2,000. In r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant Sales Tax Officer[1971] 28 S.T.C. 1. That decision now stands approved by the Supreme Court on appeal: see Assistant Sales Tax Officer v. B. C. Kame[1977] 39 S.T.C. 237 (S.C.). It has been held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court that when a photographer undertakes to take a photograph, develop the negative, or do other photographic work, and thereafter supply the prints to his clients, he....