Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1974 (9) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....judgment of the court was delivered by VEERASWAMI, C.J.-This batch of cases involves construction of section 5 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The assessee, the Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society Ltd., was found to have a turnover of Rs. 5,30,92,979.52. Out of this turnover Rs. 3,68,34,733.11 was given exemption under section 17 read with item 44 by an o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the assessment could not be singled out for charging under section 5. The argument goes so far to suggest that section 5's scope is confined only to lift or cancel the exemption limit provided by section 3(1) by the use of the words "whatever be the quantum of his turnover" in section 5. We are unable to accept that this is the proper construction to be placed on section 5. Section 3(1) is the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ails over section 3(1). That, in our opinion, is the effect of the application of the non obstante clause. If that be so, as we consider to be the case, section 5 covers the charge, the quantum of turnover to be brought under the charge and the rate. Where sales are of the specified type described in section 5, they become chargeable not under section 3(1) because of the non obstante clause in sec....