Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1974 (3) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in utensils and scrap. For the assessment year 1968-69 he disclosed his sales at Rs. 1,09,828.68. The assessing officer disbelieved the accounts and determined the turnover at Rs. 3,00,000. In appeal the turnover was fixed at Rs. 2,50,000. The assessee then went up in revision. The revising authority rejected several of the grounds upon which the departmental authorities had rejected the assessee'....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see unsatisfatory. The account books do not show that the assessee had taken any amount to his house. The account books should show every transaction of cash. It may be pointed out that the contention of the department that a sum of Rs. 1,600 was utilised for suppressed transaction cannot be ruled out." On this view the revision was dismissed. At the instance of the assessee the following question....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....next day. The view that the account books should show every transaction of cash and that the sum of Rs. 1,600 was utilised for suppressed transaction at the shop is irrelevant. The contention of the department that a sum of Rs. 1,600 was utilised for suppressed transaction does not have any material in its support and is a pure guess work. In our opinion, this contention had no relevance to the cr....