Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1973 (6) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Government. They also paid gallonage fee under section 18-A of the said Act. They were assessed to sales tax on their sales of foreign liquor in respect of the various assessment years above referred to. Resisting those assessments the petitioners contended that the foreign liquor having been subjected to sales tax under section 21-A of the Madras Prohibition Act as also a gallonage fee under section 18-A of that Act, the same cannot again be brought to charge under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, in view of section 8 read with item 3 of Schedule III of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959. It was also contended that in any event the sales tax collected and paid over to the State under section 21-A and the gallonage fee paid under sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he decision of the Tribunal. After perusing the said decision in Spencer and Co., Madras v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer, Division No. III, Madras[1969] 24 S.T.C. 161., we are convinced that at least one point has to be decided in favour of the petitioners. The first contention of the petitioners is that in view of section 8 read with item 3 of Schedule III of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, foreign liquor which has been subjected to various duties such as sales tax and gallonage fee should be taken to have been exempted from tax under the provisions of that Act. A similar contention was advanced before this court on two earlier occasions in Phipson & Co. (Private) Limited v. Government of Madras[1964] 15 S.T.C. 740. and Spencer and Co....