Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1972 (8) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he value of cotton purchased by the assessee from Messrs. Volkart Brothers. According to the assessee, the said purchase of cotton was in the course of import. The contention was negatived by the assessing authority, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the contention. The Board of Revenue, however, in exercise of its power under section 34 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, suo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....In pursuance of the said licence, Messrs. Volkart Brothers actually imported the cotton and sold the same to the assessee. According to the assessee, the importer, Messrs. Volkart Brothers, cannot sell the cotton to anyone else, as the cotton had been imported on the actual user's licence issued to the assessee and that, therefore, the sale by the importer, Messrs. Volkart Brothers, to the assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sla & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madras' rested on these two distinguishing factors and that these distinguishing factors did not obtain in the present case. We are not in a position to accept the view that there is any distinction between the facts of the case in Khosla & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madras', and of the case here. In Kho....