Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1968 (1) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as believed to have escaped assessment. The proceeding so commenced by the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer was transferred to the file of the Commercial Tax Officer for the reason that the turnover when properly determined was likely to exceed Rs. 40,000. The Commercial Tax Officer then issued a notice to the petitioner and substituted new figures for the turnover determined by the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer in consequence of which the petitioner became liable to pay enhanced sales tax. From the order made by the Commercial Tax Officer, in that way, the petitioner preferred an unsuccessful appeal to the Deputy Commissioner and the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, and in this revision petition Mr. Srinivasan for the petitioner presented....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... had been utilised for the hulling operations and the manufacture of flour. The petitioner, in his statement of objections, asserted that the basis which the Commercial Tax Officer proposed to adopt was inaccurate, and that for the hulling operations and the flour mill as much as 75 per cent. of the total electrical energy consumed by the petitioner had been expended. But in his order with respect to the period commencing on 1st April, 1960, and ending on 31st March, 1961, in which the Commercial Tax Officer discussed whether any part of the turnover had escaped assessment he said this: "Enquiries were made regarding escapement of turnover and show cause notice has been issued and served on the party on 1st May, 1965. To the show cause no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e formula suggested by the petitioner was unacceptable and if so for what reasons. It is true as contended by Mr. Shantaraju for the department, that a best judgment assessment such as the one made by the Commercial Tax Officer, to some extent, necessarily involves guess-work, and that since the Commercial Tax Officer did inform the petitioner that it would be reasonable to think that a moiety of the electrical energy was consumed by the oil-mills, it became the duty of the petitioner to prove the unsuitability of the formula on which the Commercial Tax Officer depended. It is well-settled that although a best judgment assessment must be founded in some measure on guess-work, that guess-work must be rational and reasonable. And it would be....