2009 (5) TMI 810
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Appellant. ORDER This is an appeal filed by M/s. Cauvery Motors (P) Ltd. Mangalore against Order-in-Original No. 46/08 dated 17-6-2008 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, S.T. & EOU Division Mangalore. 2. The appellants were registered service provider under the category 'Authorised Service Station'. During the course of audit it was noticed that the appellants had....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd materials sold separately; that as they had already paid sales tax on paints sold, service tax can not be charged again. Relying on Board's circular dated 5-3-2003 and holding that the invoices raised by the service providers clearly shows that the composite value of the service was artificially bifurcated into 80% as cost of the paint consumed during the provision of service and 20% as the cos....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nding on the assessee. (4) Invoking extended period, imposition of interest and penalty is not justified. 5. As requested a personal hearing was held on 9-4-2009. S/Shri. Ashok A. Deshpande and R. Dakshinamurthy, Advocates appeared and submitted their view along with copies of relevant case laws. Findings 6. I have carefully gone through the records of the case and submissions made. I find tha....