Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1961 (3) TMI 78

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llegally collected and it was maintainable; but it can only be allowed subject to the restrictions which have been imposed by the Legislature. It is not open to the claimant to rely upon the statutory right and to ignore the restrictions subject to which the right is made enforceable. We are therefore of the opinion that the High Court was right in restricting the order of refund in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The order of refund passed by the High Court, however, requires to be slightly modified and we direct that it shall run as follows: "That part of the sales tax which has been paid by Messrs Burmah Construction Co. shall be refunded by the State of Orissa to the Burmah Construction Co. if the order of assessme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under section 12(5) relating to the quarter ending on 31st March, 1950, the assessing officer as also the Collector held that the assessee was liable to pay tax from the very start of his business at Chandbali. The Tribunal was of opinion that the taxing authority had misapplied section 4(5) of the Act, inasmuch as this provision was added to the main Act by the Amending Act of 1951 and came into force on 26th November, 1951, which has no retrospective effect. Thus, the Tribunal disagreed with the Sales Tax Officer and the Assistant Collector and held that there was no evidence that the assessee exceeded the prescribed limit in his gross turnover in respect of his new business at Chandbali. Hence he was not liable to be taxed. Eventually, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion 4, under sub-section (3) once the liability to pay sales tax arises, it continues for three years, until it is cancelled or has ceased by operation of the first proviso to sub-section (3) of section 4. Admittedly in this case the assessee is a registered dealer since the commencement of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. Since his liability to pay sales tax in Orissa was continuing when he opened a new place of business at Chandbali, he was liable to pay tax on his gross turnover at Chandbali from the start of his business even if it failed to exceed Rs. 10,000. Thus, the liability of the assessee having arisen under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Act, it was continuing until after the new business was started at Chandbali. Thus, by o....