1958 (7) TMI 41

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Court was delivered by KOTVAL, J.-This is a petition preferred against an order of the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals), Eastern Division, Nagpur. The petitioner claims that certain orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner or Sales Tax and the order of the Deputy Commissioner referred to above be quashed. A preliminary objection was raised on behalf of the State by the learned Sp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he remedy is not an equally efficacious remedy because he has been asked to deposit a large sum of money as a condition precedent to the hearing of his appeal, we think that in view of the order passed in the previous proceedings before the Nagpur High Court this petition cannot lie and we need not consider the first question raised. In Miscellaneous Petition No. 374 of 1954 which was heard alo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order in Miscellaneous Petition No. 374 of 1954 have reference to an earlier decision in Miscellaneous Petition No. 347 of 1953 wherein a similar objection was overruled on the ground that the petitioner had already deposited the amount demanded from him as a condition precedent to the hearing of his appeal and therefore the principle in Himmatlal v. State of Madhya Pradesh [1954] 5 S.T.C. 11....